?

Log in

No account? Create an account

Happy First Amendment Day!

« previous entry | next entry »
Sep. 30th, 2010 | 12:34 pm
mood: contemplativecontemplative

. . . and Banned Books Week!

I've read a blog post or two recently on The Banned Book that Changed My Life. These are really cool, and a great reminder of why it's vital that these books be accessible to everyone. I'd like to do something like this, but I can't think of one specific banned book that Changed My Life, so I'm just going to list a few that made the ALA Top Ten Most Challenged lists for various years, and that I'm glad I read. These aren't necessarily ones I think are highly significant, though some are; primarily, they're ones I really enjoy.



To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee - Top Ten in 2009 for offensive language, racism, and unsuited to age group - Read this for school. Found it brilliant. Wouldn't call it a favorite book of mine, but only because it doesn't have smexy elves.

And Tango Makes Three by Peter Parnell and Justin Richardson - 2009, 2008, 2007, 2006 for homosexuality, which should not be a reason to censor a book, but has become a category thanks to all the intolerant idiots out there who complain about it - A professor read this aloud to our class. It was sweet and a nice overall kids' book as well as being a strong and beautiful assertion of acceptance and tolerance. I love that no one in the book makes it an issue that Tango has two dads. This is how real life should be, and how do you move people toward an ideal if you can't portray that ideal in fiction?

His Dark Materials trilogy by Philip Pullman - 2008, 2007 for political viewpoint, religious viewpoint, and violence - I read these when I was about fourteen, and they were REALLY IMPORTANT TO ME, MMKAY? These (and, OF COURSE, Harry Potter) are as close as I come to having a Banned Book that Changed My Life. Plus, I'd say that these books are about as atheist as Narnia is Christian, and you don't see Narnia banned a lot.

Harry Potter by J. K. Rowling - 2003, 2002, 2001 for occult/Satanism, violence - Okay, these seriously did change my life. And I have met at least one girl, nine years old at the time, whose parents wouldn't let her read them for religious purposes. These books are not "about" magic, let alone Satanism. Magic is part of their world, in much the way that alligators might be part of the world of a book set in Florida. The books are about people, and, importantly, about love and friendship and courage and loyalty and doing the right thing and GAH WHY WOULD YOU CHALLENGE THESE BOOKS.

Julie of the Wolves by Jean Craighead George - 2002 for unsuited to age group and violence - What, really? I liked this as a kid.



That's just going back to 2001, and leaving out a lot of classics that I suspect are Important but that did not inspire me personally. Is it not horrifying to think of what some people would, given the choice, not allow one or one's children to read?

Happy Banned Books Week!

Link | Leave a comment |

Comments {3}

The happy phantom

(no subject)

from: miss_maxine
date: Sep. 30th, 2010 10:31 pm (UTC)
Link

But Nic! Julie makes friends with wolves! Wolves are mean and nasty and will kill you dead first chance they get! Didn't you get the memo?

Young impressionable children, who, as we've established, believe everything that they read, will therefore read this tool of Satan masquerading as a book, and try to make friends with real wolves...and DIE!!!!1



Reply | Thread

(no subject)

from: magic_7_words
date: Oct. 1st, 2010 12:53 am (UTC)
Link

Julie of the Wolves? Aw, that was the first book I ever cried over!

Reply | Thread

"Also, I can kill you with my brain."

(no subject)

from: toastedcheese
date: Oct. 2nd, 2010 12:48 am (UTC)
Link

New headdesk - Maus being challenged for being "anti-ethnic" (according to the Huffington Post). Really?? I can only suppose that people just saw the swastika on the cover and didn't look closer and find out that it's pretty much the most widely acclaimed graphic novel of all time and a staple of Holocaust literature.

On the other hand, it's very odd and interesting that the ALA lists Twilight as being challenged for "religious viewpoint"! I'm sure whoever challenged that book meant well, but sorry, no, libraries have to stock Twilight and let teenagers read it.

Reply | Thread